As international humanitarian nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) continue to adapt their global governance arrangements in response to changes in the external environment, these changes are creating new challenges for internal coordination. However, we know little about the relationship between these governance arrangements and the forms of internal coordination INGOs adopt. This paper provides a comparative analysis of 40 INGO families with diverse backgrounds and approaches to humanitarian and development work. It examines the relationship between their global governance arrangements in terms of decision-making, integration, and membership; and the forms of internal coordination they adopt. The finding is that different forms of coordination are associated with membership size and resource disparity, combined with the varying needs for group-level capacity that comes with different forms of decision-making and integration.

中文翻译：

---

人道主义 INGO 治理安排和协调形式

随着国际人道主义非政府组织（INGO）不断调整其全球治理安排以应对外部环境的变化，这些变化正在为内部协调带来新的挑战。然而，我们对这些治理安排与 INGO 采用的内部协调形式之间的关系知之甚少。本文对 40 个具有不同背景和人道主义和发展工作方法的 INGO 家庭进行了比较分析。它从决策、整合和成员资格的角度审视了它们的全球治理安排之间的关系；以及他们采用的内部协调形式。研究结果是，不同形式的协调与成员规模和资源差距，加上不同形式的决策和整合对集团级能力的不同需求。