This paper argues that the problematic of rule following in Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations and Heidegger's analysis of anxiety in Being and Time have analogous structures. Working through these analogies helps our interpretation of both of these authors. Contrasting sceptical and anti-sceptical readings of Wittgenstein helps us to resolve an interpretive puzzle about what an authentic response to anxiety looks like for Heidegger. And considering the importance of anxiety to Heidegger's conception of authenticity allows us to locate in Wittgenstein's later philosophy a covert appeal to something resembling Heideggerian authenticity.

中文翻译：

---

规则遵循、焦虑和真实性

本文认为，维特根斯坦的哲学研究中的规则遵循问题和海德格尔对《存在与时间》中的焦虑的分析具有类似的结构。通过这些类比工作有助于我们对这两位作者的解释。对比维特根斯坦的怀疑和反怀疑阅读有助于我们解决一个解释性难题，即海德格尔对焦虑的真实反应是什么样的。考虑到焦虑对海德格尔真实性概念的重要性，我们可以在维特根斯坦后期的哲学中找到一种对类似于海德格尔真实性的隐秘诉求。