In this paper we defend legal probabilism. This is the thesis that legal standards of proof are best understood in probabilistic terms. In defending legal probabilism from a variety of objections, we highlight the most plausible forms the thesis can take and appeal to recent work in epistemology to show that the legal probabilist has more flexibility and more resources at her disposal than critics have recognised.

中文翻译：

---

法律概率论：合格的辩护

在本文中，我们捍卫法律概率论。这是一个论点，即法律证明标准最好用概率术语来理解。在从各种反对意见中为法律概率论辩护时，我们强调了该论文可以采取的最合理的形式，并诉诸于最近的认识论工作，以表明法律概率论者比批评者所认识到的具有更大的灵活性和更多的资源可供使用。