This study examines the feminist kenosis debate, tracing its development through Daphne Hampson, Sarah Coakley, Aristotle Papanikolaou, Carolyn Chau, Jennifer Newsome Martin and Anna Mercedes. Given the diversity of theologies put forth in this debate, it is necessary to have a method of evaluation. In order to do this, I will introduce the theology of Jon Sobrino to the feminist kenosis conversation. Sobrino's notions of orthodoxy, orthopraxis, and orthopathy are essential tools for assessing different interpretations of kenosis and advancing an adequate theology of “self-emptying.” This analysis leads to a proposal for a comprehensive feminist theological view of kenosis.

中文翻译：

---

正统、矫形和矫形：评估女权主义肾病辩论

本研究通过达芙妮·汉普森、莎拉·科克利、亚里士多德·帕帕尼科劳、卡罗琳·周、詹妮弗·纽瑟姆·马丁和安娜·梅赛德斯，考察了女权主义的虚无主义辩论，追踪其发展。鉴于这场辩论中提出的神学的多样性，有必要有一种评估方法。为了做到这一点，我将乔恩·索布里诺的神学引入女权主义的虚伪对话。索布里诺的正统观念、正畸疗法和矫形疗法是评估不同解释和推进适当的“自我清空”神学的重要工具。这种分析导致了对性欲的全面女权主义神学观点的建议。