ABSTRACT This paper analyses two judgments from the European Court of Justice. Both were delivered soon after the new Data Protection Regulation became applicable. The argumentation in the judgments provides timely clarification on certain key concepts in European data protection law. As the analysis will show, the ECJ continues its broad interpretation of the parties responsible for data processing. The judgments are generally compatible with the Court’s previous case law, which seeks to fill any potential gaps in the protection of individuals’ privacy rights. Hence, the aims of data protection rules are predominately interpreted by the Court within a fundamental rights framework. Even though the cases have certain significant differences, the conclusions to be drawn are similar: the argumentation of the Court is focused on data protection throughout. Moreover, the Court emphasises strong protection of personal data in all kinds of situations, even those where other rights could also be relevant.

中文翻译：

---

谁控制我们的数据？Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein 和 Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Jehovan todistajat 中欧洲法院的法律推理

摘要 本文分析了欧洲法院的两项判决。在新的数据保护条例生效后不久就交付了两者。判决书中的论证及时澄清了欧洲数据保护法中的某些关键概念。正如分析将显示的那样，欧洲法院继续对负责数据处理的各方进行广泛的解释。这些判决大体上与法院先前的判例法一致，该判例法旨在填补保护个人隐私权方面的任何潜在空白。因此，数据保护规则的目标主要由法院在基本权利框架内解释。尽管案例有一定的显着差异，但得出的结论是相似的：法院的论证始终侧重于数据保护。此外，法院强调在各种情况下对个人数据进行强有力的保护，即使是在其他权利也可能相关的情况下。