当前位置: X-MOL 学术Soils Found. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of sand liquefaction in cyclic triaxial and simple shear tests
Soils and Foundations ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-08 , DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2021.05.002
Zhen-Zhen Nong , Sung-Sik Park , Dong-Eun Lee

The liquefaction resistance and correction factors Kσ and Kα of Nakdong River sand obtained from cyclic triaxial (CTX) tests were compared with those determined by cyclic simple shear (CSS) tests to ascertain the importance of the reduction factor Cr and correction factors Kσ and Kα in liquefaction evaluations, especially in view of the lack of comparative liquefaction assessments based on different laboratory test apparatuses. All samples used for the comparisons were obtained from the same type of sand by using similar preparation methods and they were subjected to similar stress states to minimize the number of factors influencing the comparison results; moreover, the apparatuses used in the two tests were manufactured by the same company and all tests were conducted by a single operator. It was found that the liquefaction resistance in CTX tests was always greater than that in CSS tests. Furthermore, Cr varied from 0.63 to 0.36, and it depended on the relative density Dr and initial static shear ratio α. Kσ, which increased with the normal effective stress σnc in CTX tests, was identical to Kσ observed in CSS tests when α was increased up to 0.1. By contrast, Kα in the CSS tests was 58%–97% of Kα measured in the CTX tests, and it depended on the combined effect of Dr, σnc, and α. The relationship between Kα and α in both CTX and CSS tests was well represented by a parabolic function. Moreover, the differences in Kα values between the CTX and CSS tests were also found to be a parabolic function of α. This information can be used for converting CTX (or CSS) values into equivalent CSS (or CTX) values.



中文翻译:

循环三轴试验和简单剪切试验中砂土液化的比较

将循环三轴 (CTX) 试验获得的洛东河砂的液化阻力和修正系数 K σ和 K α与循环简单剪切 (CSS) 试验确定的值进行比较,以确定折减系数 C r和修正系数 K的重要性σ和 K α在液化评估中,特别是鉴于缺乏基于不同实验室测试设备的比较液化评估。用于比较的所有样品均采用相似的制备方法从同一类型的沙子中获得,并承受相似的应力状态,以尽量减少影响比较结果的因素;此外,两次测试中使用的设备由同一家公司制造,所有测试均由一名操作员进行。发现CTX测试中的液化阻力总是大于CSS测试中的。此外,C r从 0.63 到 0.36 不等,它取决于相对密度 D r和初始静态剪切比 α。ķ σ,在 CTX 测试中随着正常有效应力σ ' nc增加,当 α 增加到 0.1 时,与CSS 测试中观察到的 K σ相同。相反,K α在CSS试验为58%-97的K%α在CTX试验中测量,并且它依赖于d的组合效果- [R σ ' NC,和α。CTX 和 CSS 测试中K α和 α之间的关系由抛物线函数很好地表示。此外,K α的差异还发现 CTX 和 CSS 测试之间的值是 α 的抛物线函数。此信息可用于将 CTX(或 CSS)值转换为等效的 CSS(或 CTX)值。

更新日期:2021-08-01
down
wechat
bug