Since 1990s Stockholm housing market has seen deregulations in accordance with liberalization trends in other European welfare states. The new governance principles together with increasing immigration and public rental housing conversions into cooperative housing in attractive inner city areas have put pressure on still rental-dominated estates because fewer rental dwellings must now cater to expanding numbers of people who have little choice on the housing market. In recent decades, many estates have displayed increasing signs of stigmatization, social exclusion, and outflow of relatively affluent people. This paper improves our knowledge of how the housing policy and economic changes have affected out-mobility from the housing estates in case of three cohorts of young people and how the childhood neighbourhood conditions affect this. Individual annual Swedish registry data (1990–2014) are employed to longitudinally study the out-mobility patterns of three cohorts that grew up in the estates against the backdrop of marketization, growing inequality and deteriorating conditions. This study supplements the existing literature on housing estates by clarifying how income has become more and ethnicity less important over time in explaining sorting patterns from these estates. However, the combination of the two has determined sorting throughout the study period. Growing up in a higher socioeconomic status neighbourhood had modest impact on reducing socioeconomic differences in out-mobility from the estates, while leading to more sorting based on ethnic background.

自 1990 年代以来，斯德哥尔摩住房市场随着其他欧洲福利国家的自由化趋势而放松管制。新的治理原则，加上越来越多的移民和公共租赁住房在有吸引力的内城地区转变为合作住房，给仍然以租赁为主的房地产带来了压力，因为现在越来越少的租赁住房必须满足越来越多在​​住房市场上几乎没有选择的人的需求. 近几十年来，许多庄园显示出越来越多的污名化、社会排斥和相对富裕人群外流的迹象。本文提高了我们对住房政策和经济变化如何影响三组年轻人的外出流动以及儿童社区条件如何影响这一点的知识。个人年度瑞典登记数据（1990-2014）被用来纵向研究在市场化、不平等加剧和条件恶化的背景下在庄园长大的三个群体的外出流动模式。本研究通过阐明收入如何随着时间的推移变得越来越重要而种族在解释这些屋区的分类模式时变得越来越不重要，从而补充了现有的关于屋区的文献。然而，两者的结合决定了整个研究期间的排序。在社会经济地位较高的社区长大，对减少来自庄园的外出流动的社会经济差异的影响不大，同时导致更多的基于种族背景的分类。