当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Gambling Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Gamblers’ Perception of the Playscan Risk Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Study
Journal of Gambling Studies ( IF 2.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-05 , DOI: 10.1007/s10899-021-10043-0
David Forsström 1, 2, 3 , Alexander Rozental 1, 4 , Emma Wiklund 2 , Per Carlbring 2 , Philip Lindner 1, 5
Affiliation  

Responsible gambling (RG) tools are globally widespread; they aim to prevent or decrease the harm caused by gambling. However, existing research suggests that several included features do not decrease gambling or significantly reduce the subsequent harm. Most of the previous studies have used gambling data to understand the changes in gambling behavior. However, the literature lacks research regarding gamblers’ experience and perception of RG tools, which may provide insight into increasing the usage and effectiveness of RG tools. This mixed-methods study aimed to explore gamblers’ perception of their risk assessment in the RG tool Playscan regarding developing harmful gambling problems. Overall, 757 participants rated the perceived accuracy of their risk assessment and their perception of the overall RG tool that conducted the assessment. Participants were also allowed to leave a comment providing feedback, which was analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data was analyzed using logistic regression and structural equation modeling. Qualitative analyses revealed that most of the participants were pleased with the risk assessment and found it helpful. Moderated mediation analysis showed that participants’ assessment agreement partially mediated the association between expressing a negative view and their general view of Playscan. These results highlight the need to decrease the level of disagreement for promoting a better general view of RG tools to potentially increase their usage and effectiveness.



中文翻译:

赌徒对 Playscan 风险评估的看法:一项混合方法研究

负责任博彩 (RG) 工具在全球范围内广泛使用;他们旨在防止或减少赌博造成的伤害。然而,现有研究表明,其中包含的几个功能不会减少赌博或显着减少后续伤害。之前的大部分研究都是使用赌博数据来了解赌博行为的变化。然而,文献缺乏关于赌徒的经验和对 RG 工具的看法的研究,这可能为增加 RG 工具的使用和有效性提供洞察力。这项混合方法研究旨在探索赌徒对他们在 RG 工具 Playscan 中关于发展有害赌博问题的风险评估的看法。总体而言,757 名参与者对其风险评估的感知准确性以及他们对进行评估的整体 RG 工具的看法进行了评分。还允许参与者发表评论以提供反馈,并使用主题分析对其进行分析。使用逻辑回归和结构方程模型分析定量数据。定性分析显示,大多数参与者对风险评估感到满意并认为它有帮助。适度调解分析表明,参与者的评估协议部分调解了表达负面观点与他们对 Playscan 的一般看法之间的关联。这些结果强调需要降低分歧程度,以促进对 RG 工具有更好的一般看法,从而可能增加其使用和有效性。使用逻辑回归和结构方程模型分析定量数据。定性分析显示,大多数参与者对风险评估感到满意并认为它有帮助。适度调解分析表明,参与者的评估协议部分调解了表达负面观点与他们对 Playscan 的一般看法之间的关联。这些结果强调需要降低分歧程度,以促进对 RG 工具有更好的一般看法,从而可能增加其使用和有效性。使用逻辑回归和结构方程模型分析定量数据。定性分析显示,大多数参与者对风险评估感到满意并认为它有帮助。适度调解分析表明,参与者的评估协议部分调解了表达负面观点与他们对 Playscan 的一般看法之间的关联。这些结果强调需要降低分歧程度,以促进对 RG 工具有更好的一般看法,从而可能增加其使用和有效性。适度调解分析表明,参与者的评估协议部分调解了表达负面观点与他们对 Playscan 的一般看法之间的关联。这些结果强调需要降低分歧程度,以促进对 RG 工具有更好的一般看法,从而可能增加其使用和有效性。适度调解分析表明,参与者的评估协议部分调解了表达负面观点与他们对 Playscan 的一般看法之间的关联。这些结果强调需要降低分歧程度,以促进对 RG 工具有更好的一般看法,从而可能增加其使用和有效性。

更新日期:2021-06-05
down
wechat
bug