ABSTRACT

Steven Cooper’s lucid and persuasive paper (this issue) brings to our attention the many ways in which Winnicott was unfairly represented in Stephen Mitchell’s paper on the developmental tilt in psychoanalytic theorizing. Winnicott is not to be boxed; his writing and his practice reach forward into issues of play and intersubjective airiness seemingly unrecognized in Mitchell’s paper. At the same time, it is important to recognize the ways in which Winnicott subscribed to a particular model of mind. This included both drive and the idea of regression, in both development and treatment. Winnicott’s writing puts him in a transitional space, between Freud and the relational theories that were to come.

摘要

史蒂文·库珀（Steven Cooper）清晰而有说服力的论文（本期）让我们注意到，斯蒂芬·米切尔 (Stephen Mitchell) 的关于精神分析理论发展倾斜的论文中，温尼科特在许多方面被不公平地表现出来。温尼科特不会被装箱；他的写作和实践深入探讨了米切尔的论文中似乎没有认识到的游戏和主体间的通风问题。同时，重要的是要认识到温尼科特认同特定思维模式的方式。这包括发展和治疗中的驱动力和回归的想法。温尼科特的著作将他置于弗洛伊德和即将出现的关系理论之间的过渡空间。