This article makes a conceptual contribution to the broader literature on unfree labour by challenging the separate treatment of sexual and industrial labour exploitation both by researchers and in law and policy. This article argues that the prevailing focus of the supply chain literature on industrial labour has inadvertently posited sexual labour as the ‘other’ of industrial labour thus obfuscating how the legal blurring of boundaries between industrial and service labour is engendering new modalities of the erosion of workers’ rights that are increasingly resembling those typical of sex work. This article advances the debate on unfree labour both conceptually and empirically. Conceptually, it highlights the relevance of social reproduction in understanding forms of labour unfreedom. Empirically, it demonstrates the similarities in forms of control and exploitation between sex work and industrial work by illustrating how debt and housing operate in both settings.

本文通过挑战研究人员和法律和政策对性剥削和工业劳动剥削的分别处理，对关于不自由劳动的更广泛文献做出了概念性贡献。本文认为，供应链文献对工业劳动的普遍关注无意中将性劳动视为工业劳动的“他者”，从而混淆了工业劳动和服务劳动之间界限的法律模糊是如何产生侵蚀工人的新模式的。 ' 的权利越来越类似于性工作的典型权利。本文从概念上和经验上推进了关于不自由劳动的辩论。从概念上讲，它强调了社会再生产在理解劳动不自由形式方面的相关性。根据经验，