Sweden has been known for having one of the most equal income distributions in the world. However, in recent decades, Sweden has experienced increasing income inequality. An alternative way of measuring the development of inequality is to study and compare the income development within and between two birth cohorts according to gender and different positions of income distribution. The focus in this paper is to study how individual disposable personal income has changed by aging and at various positions of the income distribution, as well as the gender disposable income gap and intragenerational income mobility. Three positions of the income distribution were chosen: percentile 10; median; and percentile 99. Two cohorts, including all individuals born in 1948 and 1958, were tracked from 35 years of age to 53 years of age – with two 18-year overlapping periods, 1983–2000, and 1993–2010. The results show a complex and multifaceted image of the development of income inequality and mobility, within and between the two birth cohorts. Especially male low-income earners, born 1958, have been left behind. Income mobility differ according to gender where women have increased mobility in the bottom quintile and decreased in the top quintile, men experienced the opposite. When modelling mobility education have decreased to contribute to an upward mobility, especial for cohort born 1958. Taking all the results together, the development of increasing income inequality in Sweden is apparent.

瑞典以拥有世界上收入分配最平等的国家之一而闻名。然而，近几十年来，瑞典的收入不平等日益加剧。衡量不平等发展程度的另一种方法是根据性别和不同收入分配位置研究和比较两个出生队列内部和之间的收入发展情况。本文的重点是研究个人可支配收入如何随着年龄增长和收入分配的不同位置发生变化，以及性别可支配收入差距和代内收入流动。选择了收入分配的三个位置：百分位 10；中位数；和百分位数 99。两个队列，包括所有出生于 1948 年和 1958 年的个体，从 35 岁到 53 岁——有两个 18 年的重叠时期，1983-2000 和 1993-2010。结果显示了两个出生队列内部和之间的收入不平等和流动性发展的复杂和多方面的图像。尤其是 1958 年出生的男性低收入者被抛在后面。收入流动性因性别而异，女性在底层五分之一的流动性增加，在顶层五分之一减少，而男性则相反。当建模流动性教育减少以促进向上流动时，特别是对于 1958 年出生的队列。综合所有结果，瑞典收入不平等加剧的发展是显而易见的。结果显示了两个出生队列内部和之间的收入不平等和流动性发展的复杂和多方面的图像。尤其是 1958 年出生的男性低收入者被抛在后面。收入流动性因性别而异，女性在底层五分之一的流动性增加，在顶层五分之一减少，而男性则相反。当建模流动性教育减少以促进向上流动时，特别是对于 1958 年出生的队列。综合所有结果，瑞典收入不平等加剧的发展是显而易见的。结果显示了两个出生队列内部和之间的收入不平等和流动性发展的复杂和多方面的图像。尤其是 1958 年出生的男性低收入者被抛在后面。收入流动性因性别而异，女性在底层五分之一的流动性增加，在顶层五分之一减少，而男性则相反。当建模流动性教育减少以促进向上流动时，特别是对于 1958 年出生的队列。综合所有结果，瑞典收入不平等加剧的发展是显而易见的。男人的经历正好相反。当建模流动性教育减少以促进向上流动时，特别是对于 1958 年出生的队列。综合所有结果，瑞典收入不平等加剧的发展是显而易见的。男人的经历正好相反。当建模流动性教育减少以促进向上流动时，特别是对于 1958 年出生的队列。综合所有结果，瑞典收入不平等加剧的发展是显而易见的。