Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on “Exploring new ways of thinking about and developing staff practice: the role of modes of thinking” written by Roy Deveau, John Ockenden and Petra Bjorne.

Design/methodology/approach

The commentary considers the consistency of Kahneman’s model of thinking fast and slow with brain research.

Findings

The thinking styles of staff undoubtedly influence their responses to people with learning disabilities. Although Kahneman’s model provides a heuristic approach to tackling prejudicial and biased thinking, it risks incomplete solutions through bypassing some of the factors contributing to staff behaviour.

Originality/value

This commentary concludes that Kahneman’s model is not completely consistent with knowledge about how the brain is organized. This should be regarded as a limitation of any model seeking to explain decision-making.

中文翻译：

---

评《探索新的员工实践思维方式与发展：思维方式的作用》

目的

本文的目的是对 Roy Deveau、John Ockenden 和 Petra Bjorne 撰写的“探索新的思考和发展员工实践的新方法：思维模式的作用”提供评论。

设计/方法/方法

评论认为卡尼曼的快慢思维模式与大脑研究的一致性。

发现

员工的思维方式无疑会影响他们对有学习障碍的人的反应。尽管 Kahneman 的模型提供了一种启发式方法来解决偏见和有偏见的思维，但它通过绕过一些影响员工行为的因素来冒着不完整解决方案的风险。

原创性/价值

这篇评论的结论是，卡尼曼的模型与大脑如何组织的知识并不完全一致。这应该被视为任何试图解释决策的模型的局限性。