当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sex Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
‘They talked completely about straight couples only’: schooling, sexual violence and sexual and gender minority youth
Sex Education ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-01 , DOI: 10.1080/14681811.2021.1924142
Margaret MacAulay 1 , Michele Ybarra 2 , Elizabeth Saewyc 1 , Richard Sullivan 1 , Lauren Jackson 2 , Shannon Millar 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Scholarly conversations regarding sexual violence and sexuality education typically emphasise cisgender and heterosexual experiences, leaving sexual and gender minority young people’s voices unheard. This happens despite adolescence being a crucial period for the onset of sexual violence, with sexual and gender minority youth reporting elevated levels of victimisation. Moreover, the preponderance of research focusing on victimisation suggests notable gaps in our understanding of sexual violence perpetration. This study examined contextual factors shaping sexual violence victimisation and perpetration among sexual and gender minority youth, with school playing a key role. Based on qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 50 young people aged 14–26 years who self-reported sexual violence perpetration in the Growing Up with Media survey, the analysis demonstrates how schooling’s ‘hidden curriculum’ leaves sexual and gender minority youth ill-equipped to navigate the world of sexuality. Formal sexuality education remains heteronormative and gender-segregated, resulting in incomplete understandings of sexual violence. At the informal level, gendered double standards and peer norms reinforce the second-class sexual citizenship of sexual and gender minority youth. Our findings suggest that schools may be complicit in sexual violence victimisation and perpetration by sending limited and mixed messages regarding gender and sexuality. Research and policy implications are discussed.



中文翻译:

“他们完全只谈论异性恋夫妇”:学校教育、性暴力以及性和性别少数青年

摘要

关于性暴力和性教育的学术对话通常强调顺性别和异性恋经历,而忽略了性少数和性别少数年轻人的声音。尽管青春期是性暴力发生的关键时期,性暴力和性别少数青年报告受害程度较高,但这种情况还是发生了。此外,侧重于受害的研究的优势表明我们对性暴力行为的理解存在显着差距。本研究调查了影响性暴力和性别少数青年中性暴力受害和实施的背景因素,其中学校发挥了关键作用。基于对 50 名 14-26 岁年轻人的半结构化访谈的定性数据,他们在“与媒体一起成长”调查中自我报告了性暴力行为,该分析展示了学校教育的“隐藏课程”如何让性少数和性别少数群体青年无法适应性世界。正规的性教育仍然是异性恋规范和性别隔离的,导致对性暴力的理解不完整。在非正式层面,性别双重标准和同伴规范强化了性和性别少数青年的二等性公民身份。我们的研究结果表明,学校可能通过发送有关性别和性行为的有限和混合信息,成为性暴力受害和实施的同谋。讨论了研究和政策影响。正规的性教育仍然是异性恋规范和性别隔离的,导致对性暴力的理解不完整。在非正式层面,性别双重标准和同伴规范强化了性和性别少数青年的二等性公民身份。我们的研究结果表明,学校可能通过发送有关性别和性行为的有限和混合信息,成为性暴力受害和实施的同谋。讨论了研究和政策影响。正规的性教育仍然是异性恋规范和性别隔离的,导致对性暴力的理解不完整。在非正式层面,性别双重标准和同伴规范强化了性和性别少数青年的二等性公民身份。我们的研究结果表明,学校可能通过发送有关性别和性行为的有限和混合信息,成为性暴力受害和实施的同谋。讨论了研究和政策影响。我们的研究结果表明,学校可能通过发送有关性别和性行为的有限和混合信息,成为性暴力受害和实施的同谋。讨论了研究和政策影响。我们的研究结果表明,学校可能通过发送有关性别和性行为的有限和混合信息,成为性暴力受害和实施的同谋。讨论了研究和政策影响。

更新日期:2021-06-01
down
wechat
bug