The morphology and nanostructure of carbon and glass fiber are investigated by using XRD, SEM and TEM analysis. The composites are divided into three groups which consists of “without post-curing”, “post-cured at 80 °C for 6 hrs” and “post-cured at 120 °C for 3 hrs” to investigate curing temperature effect. The mechanical properties of composites are tested in the indentation, tensile, and flexural machine with ASTM standard. According to the results, the hardness of post-curing of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) are increased approximately three-times and 5 % compared to with and without post-curing process. The tensile strength of CFRP and GFRP are approximately 458 MPa and 385 MPa, while post-cured at 120 °C for the three-hour results are 490 MPa and 433 MPa respectively. In contrast, composites of treated fiber are not improved mechanical strength significantly for CFRP, while GFRP are slightly increased by 7 %. On the other hand, the flexural strength of treated carbon and glass fiber of composite are increased to 3 % and 15 % respectively. Higher temperature and treated fiber composites of carbon fiber are not significantly improved because high temperature curing and treated fiber created more porous to occur fracture internally.

通过XRD、SEM和TEM分析研究了碳和玻璃纤维的形貌和纳米结构。将复合材料分为“未后固化”、“80°C 后固化 6 小时”和“120°C 后固化 3 小时”三组，以研究固化温度的影响。复合材料的机械性能在压痕机、拉伸机和弯曲机中按照 ASTM 标准进行测试。结果表明，碳纤维增强聚合物 (CFRP) 和玻璃纤维增​​强聚合物 (GFRP) 的后固化硬度与有和没有后固化过程相比提高了约 3 倍和 5%。CFRP 和 GFRP 的拉伸强度约为 458 MPa 和 385 MPa，而在 120 °C 下后固化三小时的结果分别为 490 MPa 和 433 MPa。相比之下，经处理的纤维复合材料对 CFRP 的机械强度没有显着提高，而 GFRP 则略微提高了 7%。另一方面，复合材料处理后的碳纤维和玻璃纤维的抗弯强度分别提高了3%和15%。碳纤维的高温和处理过的纤维复合材料没有显着改善，因为高温固化和处理过的纤维会产生更多的孔隙，从而在内部发生断裂。