The study compared the tactical behaviour and skill efficacy of young novice basketball players during small-sided games (SSGs) in situations of numerical equality (3vs.3), numerical superiority (3vs.2), and a non-scorer floater (3vs.3 + 1). A total of forty-five schoolchildren (11.55 ± 0.49 years) from both sexes with no previous experience in basketball participated in ten four-minute SSGs of each format for four 1-h sessions. The Game Performance Assessment Instrument was used to analyse tactical behaviour and skill efficacy. Friedman’s test, Dunn’s post hoc test, and r effect size were used to compare the variables between SSGs. Pass inefficacy (3vs.3 > 3vs.2; p = 0.004; large effect), rebound efficacy (3vs.2 > 3vs.3 + 1 and 3vs.3; p = 0.002; large effect), support (3vs.3 > 3vs.3 + 1 e 3vs.2; p = 0.002; medium effect), and guard/mark (3vs.2 > 3vs.3 and 3vs.3 + 1; p = 0.001; medium effect) showed significant differences between SSGs. The results support the hypothesis that an unbalanced SSG is less complex than an SSG with numerical equality, as the technical-tactical performance is higher in unbalanced SSGs.

该研究比较了年轻篮球新手在小场比赛 (SSG) 中在人数相等 (3vs.3)、人数优势 (3vs.2) 和非得分手浮动 (3vs.3) 的情况下的战术行为和技能效果。 3 + 1）。共有 45 名以前没有篮球经验的男女学生（11.55 ± 0.49 岁）参加了每种格式的 10 次 4 分钟 SSG，为期 4 次 1 小时。游戏性能评估仪用于分析战术行为和技能效果。Friedman 检验、Dunn 事后检验和 r 效应大小用于比较 SSG 之间的变量。传球无效（3vs.3 > 3vs.2；p = 0.004；大效应），反弹效力（3vs.2 > 3vs.3 + 1和3vs.3；p = 0.002；大效应），支持（3vs.3 > 3vs.3 + 1 e 3vs.2；p = 0.002；中等效果），和守卫/标记（3vs.2 > 3vs.3 和 3vs.3 + 1；p = 0.001；中等效应）显示 SSG 之间的显着差异。结果支持不平衡 SSG 比具有数值相等的 SSG 更简单的假设，因为不平衡 SSG 的技战术性能更高。