This research analyses workers’ mobilization power in Chile through the joint-cost model, suggesting that wider tactical repertoires, and especially transgressive ones, tend to result in shorter strikes, as a proxy of relative success against the employers. Using the Labor Strike Observatory's original dataset, we study this relation in the Chilean case, where neoliberalism has weakened unions and constrained the occurrence of strikes at the workplace level. We advanced two quantitative methods of analysis. First, using latent class analysis, we identify the tactical repertoires used by strikers. Second, following an event history methodology, we estimate the contribution of each repertoire to the risk of ending the strike. This paper analyses the strategies and milestones of strikers’ actions, shows the greater power of violent tactics compared to peaceful ones at the beginning of the conflict and finally discusses some limitations of the joint-cost model in the capital–labour relation.

中文翻译：

---

在罢工中使用什么战术曲目以及何时使用它？智利工人的战略及其动员力量（2010-2018 年）

这项研究通过联合成本模型分析了智利工人的动员力量，表明更广泛的战术手段，尤其是违规的手段，往往会导致罢工时间更短，作为对雇主的相对成功的代表。使用劳工罢工观察站的原始数据集，我们研究了智利案例中的这种关系，其中新自由主义削弱了工会并限制了工作场所罢工的发生。我们提出了两种定量分析方法。首先，使用潜在类别分析，我们确定了前锋使用的战术曲目。其次，根据事件历史方法，我们估计每个曲目对结束罢工风险的贡献。本文分析了罢工者行动的策略和里程碑，