ABSTRACT

National Reconciliation in Algeria is a controversial subject that provokes considerable debates among human rights organisations as well as opposition parties. Since the third term of Abdelaziz Bouteflika, many manifestations of civil war victims have been organised across the country. While it is deemed for a long time that the enforced disappearance file is the only stake for the reconciliation process, these recent protests illustrate the extent to which the process fails to address the past legacies. Alternative pasts have resurfaced to challenge the official discourse that has been implanted for twenty years. Using a bottom-up approach, this article inquiries and assesses national reconciliation in Algeria by distinguishing between different victims’ groups. It demonstrates how the process has been presented, interpreted, and evaluated by different victims’ groups based on the in-depth research.

摘要

阿尔及利亚的民族和解是一个有争议的话题，在人权组织和反对党之间引发了大量辩论。自阿卜杜拉齐兹·布特弗利卡第三任期以来，全国各地组织了许多内战受害者的表现形式。虽然长期以来人们认为强迫失踪档案是和解进程的唯一利害关系，但最近的这些抗议表明该进程未能解决过去遗留问题的程度。另类的过去重新浮出水面，挑战已经植入二十年的官方话语。本文采用自下而上的方法，通过区分不同的受害者群体来调查和评估阿尔及利亚的民族和解。它展示了该过程是如何被呈现、解释、