This dialogue begins with the question of ‘contraction’ and explores how this embodied concept may help expand our thinking on reproductive geographies. Following our interlocutors’ lead, we think with (and against) Jane Bennett and her work on dilation here. We go on to think about these contractions in relation to various ‘contracts’ – not least those forged between researcher and participant. Here we delve into questions of what a ‘non-participatory action research’ contract might look like. We then conclude by taking seriously the following question: why is there still a prevailing whiteness in reproductive geographies?

中文翻译：

---

生殖地理：再现白度吗？

这场对话从“收缩”问题开始，并探讨了这个具体概念如何有助于扩大我们对生殖地理的思考。在对话者的引导下，我们与简·本内特（Jane Bennett）及其在扩张方面的工作（并反对）进行了思考。我们继续考虑这些与各种“合同”有关的收缩，尤其是研究人员和参与者之间订立的那些收缩。在这里，我们深入探讨“非参与式行动研究”合同可能是什么样的问题。然后，我们通过认真考虑以下问题来得出结论：为什么生殖地理区域仍然普遍存在白度现象？