当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Palaeogeogr. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Correction to: The turbidite-contourite-tidalite-baroclinite-hybridite problem: orthodoxy vs. empirical evidence behind the “Bouma Sequence”
Journal of Palaeogeography ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-27 , DOI: 10.1186/s42501-021-00093-1
G. Shanmugam

Correction to: Journal of Palaeogeography 10, 9 (2021)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00085-1

Following publication of the original article (Shanmugam 2021), two minor typos were found in the Abstract, in line 6, the ‘muddy contorts’ should be ‘muddy contourites’. In line 8, the ‘contoured facies’ should be ‘contourite facies’. The original paper has been updated.

  1. Shanmugam, G. 2021. The turbidite-contourite-tidalite-baroclinite-hybridite problem: orthodoxy vs. empirical evidence behind the “Bouma Sequence”. Journal of Palaeogeography 10: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00085-1.

    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA

    G. Shanmugam

Authors
  1. G. ShanmugamView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Shanmugam.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shanmugam, G. Correction to: The turbidite-contourite-tidalite-baroclinite-hybridite problem: orthodoxy vs. empirical evidence behind the “Bouma Sequence”. J. Palaeogeogr. 10, 14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00093-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00093-1



中文翻译:

更正为:浊积石-亚辉石-辉绿岩-斜方晶石-杂岩体问题:正统与“ Bouma序列”背后的经验证据

更正为:古地理学报10,9(2021)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00085-1

在原始文章发表之后(Shanmugam 2021),在摘要中发现了两个较小的错别字,在第6行中,“泥泞扭曲”应该是“泥泞轮廓”。在第8行中,“轮廓相”应为“轮廓相”。原始文件已更新。

  1. Shanmugam,G。2021.浊积岩-亚辉石-辉绿岩-斜方晶石-杂辉岩问题:正统与“ Bouma序列”背后的经验证据。古地理杂志10:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00085-1。

    文章Google学术搜索

下载参考

隶属关系

  1. 德克萨斯大学阿灵顿分校地球与环境科学系,美国德克萨斯州阿灵顿,76019

    G.山穆甘

作者
  1. G. Shanmugam查看作者出版物

    您也可以在PubMed Google学术搜索中搜索该作者 

通讯作者

对应于G. Shanmugam。

开放存取本文是根据知识共享署名4.0国际许可许可的,该许可允许以任何媒介或格式使用,共享,改编,分发和复制,只要您对原始作者和出处提供适当的信誉,即可提供链接到知识共享许可,并指出是否进行了更改。本文的图像或其他第三方材料包含在该文章的知识共享许可中,除非在该材料的信用额度中另有说明。如果该材料未包含在该文章的创用CC许可中,并且您的预期使用未得到法律法规的许可或超出了许可的使用范围,则您将需要直接从版权所有者那里获得许可。要查看此许可证的副本,请访问http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。

转载和许可

通过CrossMark验证货币和真实性

引用本文

Shanmugam,G.对以下问题的更正:浊积石-亚辉石-辉铁矿-斜方晶石-杂岩体问题:“ Bouma序列”背后的正统与经验证据。J.古地理 10, 14(2021)。https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00093-1

下载引文

  • 发表时间

  • DOI https //doi.org/10.1186/s42501-021-00093-1

更新日期:2021-05-27
down
wechat
bug