In relation to the admissibility of evidence obtained using projective personality tests arose in F v. Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatam (2018). The Court of Justice of the European Union has held that an expert’s report can only be accepted if it is based on the international scientific community’s standards, but has refrained from stipulating what these standards are. It appears timely for European psychologists to decide what standards should be applied to determine whether or not a test is appropriate for psycholegal use. We propose standards and then apply them to the Rorschach because it was used in this case and is an exemplar of projective tests. We conclude that the Rorschach does not meet the proposed standards and that psychologists should abstain from using it in legal proceedings even in the absence of a clear judicial prohibition.

关于使用投射性人格测试获得的证据的可接受性，出现在F v. Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatam (2018) 案中。欧盟法院认为，专家的报告只有基于国际科学界的标准才能被接受，但没有规定这些标准是什么。欧洲心理学家似乎应该及时决定应采用什么标准来确定测试是否适合法律心理用途。我们提出标准，然后将其应用于罗夏墨迹测验，因为它在本例中使用，并且是投射测试的典范。我们的结论是，罗夏墨迹测验不符合拟议的标准，即使没有明确的司法禁止，心理学家也应避免在法律诉讼中使用它。