The dichotomy between the qualitative and the quantitative has been a classic throughout the history of science. As will be seen, this dichotomy permeates all ontological levels of reality. In this work, phenomenological examples potentially related to semiosis are presented at the different levels established by Mario Bunge and Josep Ferrater Mora, contrasting the qualitative categorizations with the quantifiable physical reality. Likewise, the need to continue in the quantification of the biosemiotic and linguistic studies will be presented, while, in contrast, the need to establish a qualitative framework in the little-addressed study of technosemiotics will be raised, of potential interest given the notable advances that are expected in communication systems for inert artifacts in the next years. In short, in the thesis defended here the qualitative precedes the quantitative in the defining path of science.

在整个科学史上，定性与定量之间的二分法一直是经典。可以看出，这种二分法贯穿了现实的所有本体论层面。在这项工作中，在马里奥·邦奇（Mario Bunge）和何塞普·费拉特（Josep Ferrater Mora）建立的不同层次上，提出了与符号学潜在相关的现象学实例，将定性分类与可量化的物理现实进行了对比。同样，将提出继续对生物符号学和语言学研究进行量化的需求，与此相反，将提出在鲜为人知的技术符号学研究中建立定性框架的需求，鉴于显着的进步，这可能引起人们的兴趣预计在未来几年会在通信系统中用于惰性文物。简而言之，