Published as part of ACS Chemical Health & Safety virtual special issue “Laboratory Design to Enable Safe, Secure, and Sustainable Research” helps to maintain room pressurization by affecting direction of airflow in combination with supply and exhaust ventilation rates; controls the spread of fire and smoke to the lab; and secures the lab and its hazardous materials from unauthorized people. the scope of the work the available budget the work deadline Figure 1. Three competing goals in the project management puzzle mean that there is no single solution to this three-body problem. This challenge places project managers in the role of continually juggling these three goals. Figure 2. While each laboratory building has its own specific history, specific stages in its lifecycle can be used to identify salient features of its design and use. Figure 3. To provide some structure for explaining the design process, these stakeholder subgroups can be used to organize the population involved in the design and operation of a laboratory building. Figure 4. Laboratory stakeholders have diverse deadlines associated with their assigned work. A design process that does not acknowledge these differences is likely to lead to significant confusion as its work proceeds. Figure 5. While the teaching and research that laboratory staff conduct are the primary motivation for constructing laboratory buildings, many other professions support this work. Understanding the role of these support staff in operating and maintaining the building is important in the success of both the building and the scientists who occupy it. What do laboratory workers need to understand about the infrastructure of their laboratories. For example, how do plumbing, ventilation, room layout, and other factors impact their science? What do lab designers need to understand about laboratory research? For example, how has lab design improved or impeded research protocols? What have laboratory designers missed as they develop plans for new and renovated laboratories under tight budgets and deadlines? For example, what types of flexible design could have been incorporated that would reduce energy use? What is the role of the academic leadership (provosts, deans, and chairs) in supporting safe science in the facilities? What forms of communication between facility stakeholders have proven most effective in your experience? Views expressed in this editorial are those of the authors and not necessarily the views of the ACS. Views expressed in this editorial are those of the authors and not necessarily the views of the ACS.
We would like to thank the following people for their insights that helped shape this call for papers on laboratory design: Daniel Woodie, Cornell University; Christopher Incarvito, Yale University; Scott Good, University of South Carolina, retired; and Debbie Decker, University of California, Davis, retired. This article has not yet been cited by other publications. Figure 1. Three competing goals in the project management puzzle mean that there is no single solution to this three-body problem. This challenge places project managers in the role of continually juggling these three goals. Figure 2. While each laboratory building has its own specific history, specific stages in its lifecycle can be used to identify salient features of its design and use. Figure 3. To provide some structure for explaining the design process, these stakeholder subgroups can be used to organize the population involved in the design and operation of a laboratory building. Figure 4. Laboratory stakeholders have diverse deadlines associated with their assigned work. A design process that does not acknowledge these differences is likely to lead to significant confusion as its work proceeds. Figure 5. While the teaching and research that laboratory staff conduct are the primary motivation for constructing laboratory buildings, many other professions support this work. Understanding the role of these support staff in operating and maintaining the building is important in the success of both the building and the scientists who occupy it.

中文翻译：

---

安全实验室设计：论文征集

作为ACS化学品健康与安全的一部分发布 virtual special issue “Laboratory Design to Enable Safe, Secure, and Sustainable Research” helps to maintain room pressurization by affecting direction of airflow in combination with supply and exhaust ventilation rates; controls the spread of fire and smoke to the lab; and secures the lab and its hazardous materials from unauthorized people. the scope of the work the available budget the work deadline Figure 1. Three competing goals in the project management puzzle mean that there is no single solution to this three-body problem. This challenge places project managers in the role of continually juggling these three goals. Figure 2. While each laboratory building has its own specific history, specific stages in its lifecycle can be used to identify salient features of its design and use. Figure 3. To provide some structure for explaining the design process, these stakeholder subgroups can be used to organize the population involved in the design and operation of a laboratory building. Figure 4. Laboratory stakeholders have diverse deadlines associated with their assigned work. A design process that does not acknowledge these differences is likely to lead to significant confusion as its work proceeds. Figure 5. While the teaching and research that laboratory staff conduct are the primary motivation for constructing laboratory buildings, many other professions support this work. Understanding the role of these support staff in operating and maintaining the building is important in the success of both the building and the scientists who occupy it. What do laboratory workers need to understand about the infrastructure of their laboratories. For example, how do plumbing, ventilation, room layout, and other factors impact their science? What do lab designers need to understand about laboratory research? For example, how has lab design improved or impeded research protocols? What have laboratory designers missed as they develop plans for new and renovated laboratories under tight budgets and deadlines? For example, what types of flexible design could have been incorporated that would reduce energy use? What is the role of the academic leadership (provosts, deans, and chairs) in supporting safe science in the facilities? What forms of communication between facility stakeholders have proven most effective in your experience? Views expressed in this editorial are those of the authors and not necessarily the views of the ACS. Views expressed in this editorial are those of the authors and not necessarily the views of the ACS.
We would like to thank the following people for their insights that helped shape this call for papers on laboratory design: Daniel Woodie, Cornell University; Christopher Incarvito, Yale University; Scott Good, University of South Carolina, retired; and Debbie Decker, University of California, Davis, retired. This article has not yet been cited by other publications. Figure 1. Three competing goals in the project management puzzle mean that there is no single solution to this three-body problem. This challenge places project managers in the role of continually juggling these three goals. Figure 2. While each laboratory building has its own specific history, specific stages in its lifecycle can be used to identify salient features of its design and use. Figure 3. To provide some structure for explaining the design process, these stakeholder subgroups can be used to organize the population involved in the design and operation of a laboratory building. Figure 4. Laboratory stakeholders have diverse deadlines associated with their assigned work. A design process that does not acknowledge these differences is likely to lead to significant confusion as its work proceeds. Figure 5. While the teaching and research that laboratory staff conduct are the primary motivation for constructing laboratory buildings, many other professions support this work. Understanding the role of these support staff in operating and maintaining the building is important in the success of both the building and the scientists who occupy it.