Vehicular Ad-hoc NETworks (VANETs) is an important research domain as it deals with the safety of vehicles moving on roads. The selection of the most prominent routing protocol in this field is a challenging job due to the high mobility rate of VANETs. The foremost motive for writing this paper is to recognize the most suitable protocol that can be used for a high-density traffic region. Therefore, the evaluation of six popular routing protocols (AODV, DSDV, DSR, GPSR, OLSR, and ZRP) of VANETs is examined in the congested city of Delhi. For this, a methodology is being presented that explains the creation of a network using the SUMO tool and assigning a trip and route to the obtained network through the Origin-Destination matrix. Then, by adopting the created network file, the TCL File and NAM File are generated using the NS-2. Finally, selected protocols' performance is examined and evaluated based on the metrics such as Throughput, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Delay, Packet Loss Ratio (PLR), and Routing Overhead. The results showed that the AODV protocol acts as an appropriate routing protocol and could perform better with our presented approach. Also, the comparison is conducted with the results obtained for the AODV routing protocol using the presented approach and the existing approaches. The comparison results depict that the AODV routing protocol presents much better results by using the presented methodology than by using the existing methods in terms of throughput, delay, and PDR.

车载自组织网络 (VANET) 是一个重要的研究领域，因为它处理在道路上行驶的车辆的安全性。由于 VANET 的高移动性，选择该领域最突出的路由协议是一项具有挑战性的工作。撰写本文的首要动机是识别可用于高密度交通区域的最合适的协议。因此，在拥挤的德里市对 VANET 的六种流行路由协议（AODV、DSDV、DSR、GPSR、OLSR 和 ZRP）进行了评估。为此，提出了一种方法，该方法解释了使用 SUMO 工具创建网络并通过起点-目的地矩阵为获得的网络分配行程和路线。然后，通过采用创建的网络文件，使用NS-2生成TCL文件和NAM文件。最后，根据吞吐量、数据包传递率 (PDR)、延迟、数据包丢失率 (PLR) 和路由开销等指标检查和评估所选协议的性能。结果表明，AODV 协议可以作为一种合适的路由协议，并且可以通过我们提出的方法更好地执行。此外，还与使用提出的方法和现有方法的 AODV 路由协议获得的结果进行了比较。比较结果表明，AODV 路由协议使用所提出的方法比使用现有方法在吞吐量、延迟和 PDR 方面呈现出更好的结果。结果表明，AODV 协议可以作为一种合适的路由协议，并且可以通过我们提出的方法更好地执行。此外，还与使用提出的方法和现有方法的 AODV 路由协议获得的结果进行了比较。比较结果表明，AODV 路由协议使用所提出的方法比使用现有方法在吞吐量、延迟和 PDR 方面呈现出更好的结果。结果表明，AODV 协议可以作为一种合适的路由协议，并且可以通过我们提出的方法更好地执行。此外，还与使用提出的方法和现有方法的 AODV 路由协议获得的结果进行了比较。比较结果表明，AODV 路由协议使用所提出的方法比使用现有方法在吞吐量、延迟和 PDR 方面呈现出更好的结果。