In the literature, the design approach has been mainly focused on products, however, manufacturing process awareness lacks structure measurements of the organization resources and their productive capacity to systematize the adoption of newer technologies and automation of production lines. Due to this fact, there is a remaining gap in the adoption of technological resources to automate them. The study of manufacturing processes has made it possible to identify three opportunity areas in any type of organization: i) structured processes, ii) industrial environmental knowledge and iii) technological adoption. This article presents a taxonomy that structure available information in manufacturing processes into five levels to characterize, redesign, or develop them from scratch. To get a better comprehension of the environment, it is possible to enhance awareness of energy consumption, waste management, information flow and emissions control through Sensors, collection, processing, and communication of information through Smart components. The technological adoption goes hand in hand with the sustainable objectives of the organization and dictates the search for alternatives throughout the development or redesign of the manufacturing process to pursue economic, social and environmental objectives. Besides, the taxonomy was used in the characterization and updating of four manufacturing processes for a modular machine. These four case studies allow for better insight into the design process. The changes between the initial and final stages after the update were recorded in the S³ Scorecard to visualize the increase of the characteristics and to chart a route for future technological acquisitions. The proposal has made it possible to locate the characteristics of the manufacturing process at one level and align the objectives of the organization to a technology acquisition plan since manufacturing firms are looking to future-proof their investments by acquiring solutions to comply current regulations while maintaining low-cost operations.

在文献中，设计方法主要集中在产品上，但是，制造过程意识缺乏组织资源的结构度量，也缺乏将采用新技术和自动化生产线系统化的生产能力。由于这个事实，在采用技术资源使其自动化方面仍然存在差距。通过对制造过程的研究，可以确定任何类型的组织中的三个机会领域：i）结构化过程，ii）工业环境知识和iii）技术采用。本文介绍了一种分类法，该分类法将制造过程中的可用信息分为五个级别，以从头进行表征，重新设计或开发它们。为了更好地了解环境，通过传感器，通过智能组件收集，处理和传达信息，可以提高对能耗，废物管理，信息流和排放控制的认识。技术的采用与组织的可持续目标密切相关，并指示在整个制造过程的开发或重新设计过程中寻求替代方案，以追求经济，社会和环境目标。此外，该分类法还用于表征和更新模块化机器的四个制造过程。这四个案例研究可让您更好地了解设计过程。更新后初始阶段和最终阶段之间的变化记录在S中 通过传感器进行信息流和排放控制，通过智能组件进行信息的收集，处理和通信。技术的采用与组织的可持续目标密切相关，并指示在整个制造过程的开发或重新设计过程中寻求替代方案，以追求经济，社会和环境目标。此外，该分类法还用于表征和更新模块化机器的四个制造过程。这四个案例研究可让您更好地了解设计过程。更新后初始阶段和最终阶段之间的变化记录在S中 通过传感器进行信息流和排放控制，通过智能组件进行信息的收集，处理和通信。技术的采用与组织的可持续目标密切相关，并指示在整个制造过程的开发或重新设计过程中寻求替代方案，以追求经济，社会和环境目标。此外，该分类法还用于表征和更新模块化机器的四个制造过程。这四个案例研究可让您更好地了解设计过程。更新后初始阶段和最终阶段之间的变化记录在S中 技术的采用与组织的可持续目标密切相关，并指示在整个制造过程的开发或重新设计过程中寻求替代方案，以追求经济，社会和环境目标。此外，该分类法还用于表征和更新模块化机器的四个制造过程。这四个案例研究可让您更好地了解设计过程。更新后初始阶段和最终阶段之间的变化记录在S中 技术的采用与组织的可持续目标密切相关，并指示在整个制造过程的开发或重新设计过程中寻求替代方案，以追求经济，社会和环境目标。此外，该分类法还用于表征和更新模块化机器的四个制造过程。这四个案例研究可让您更好地了解设计过程。更新后初始阶段和最终阶段之间的变化记录在S中 这四个案例研究可让您更好地了解设计过程。更新后初始阶段和最终阶段之间的变化记录在S中 这四个案例研究可让您更好地了解设计过程。更新后初始阶段和最终阶段之间的变化记录在S中³记分卡，以可视化特性的增加并为将来的技术获取制定路线。该提议使将制造过程的特征定位在一个层次上并使组织的目标与技术采购计划保持一致成为可能，因为制造公司正在寻求通过获取解决方案来满足投资需求，从而在不降低成本的情况下遵守当前法规，从而对投资进行未来验证成本操作。