ABSTRACT

Broader participation in land use planning processes by site users is often interpreted as a challenge to existing planning schemes. However, when participation becomes compulsory in planning procedures, guidelines regarding public participation are rarely imposed. The question arises as to whether public participation, in any form, truly introduces challenges to current planning schemes. In the case of an extension project of a French campus, site users were interviewed, either spontaneously or aided, through an experimental protocol, concerning the value of built and non-built elements of the campus, the extent of their value, and whether they should be preserved in future planning. The primary objective of this study was to prove that unguided participation may be counter-productive and lead to reproduction of the existing planning schemes. Individual preferences are too determined by the current situation of the site and site users are not typically visionaries.

摘要

场地用户更广泛地参与土地利用规划过程通常被解释为对现有规划方案的挑战。然而，当参与成为规划程序的强制性要求时，很少强加有关公众参与的指导方针。问题在于，以任何形式的公众参与是否真的给当前的规划方案带来了挑战。在法国校园扩建项目的案例中，现场用户通过实验协议自发地或辅助地接受了采访，内容涉及校园建成和非建成元素的价值、它们的价值范围，以及他们是否应该保留在未来的规划中。本研究的主要目的是证明无引导的参与可能会适得其反，并导致现有规划方案的复制。