ABSTRACT

Family Dick is a commercial gay pornography website that has courted controversy for both its stepfather-son theme and for the youthful stylings of its Daddy’s Little Boy series. This article reads viewer commentary (selected from more than 700 comments) of scenes within the series posted to its Pornhub channel. Textual analysis is employed to read the series itself and its distinctive esthetic, which logically leads to discussion of views on the too-young “look” of the series and the use of certain “legislative language” by those who deem the content to be potentially unlawful. The article also considers the implications resultant from the range of views presented in the discourse and a tendency for the series to inspire viewers to reflect on personal experiences and desires. As the first study of its kind, it ends by nominating a range of future research directions.

摘要

Family Dick 是一个商业同性恋色情网站，因其继父-儿子主题和爸爸的小男孩的年轻风格而引起争议系列。本文阅读了发布到其 Pornhub 频道的系列中场景的观众评论（选自 700 多条评论）。文本分析被用来解读该系列本身及其独特的审美，这在逻辑上引发了对那些认为该内容潜在的人对系列过于年轻的“外观”和使用某些“立法语言”的看法的讨论。非法的。本文还考虑了话语中呈现的各种观点所产生的影响，以及该系列激发观众反思个人经历和愿望的趋势。作为同类研究中的第一项，它最后提名了一系列未来的研究方向。