This reply to Gila Stopler’s provocative piece on the possible complicity of political liberalism and right-wing populism welcomes Stopler’s strategy of identifying structural weaknesses in liberal theory. But it also presents three specific disagreements: first, it is argued that Rawls is much less of a defender of the status quo in really existing liberal democracies than Stopler makes him out to be; second, the argument is advanced that political liberalism has significant resources to counter right-wing populism; and, third and most important, it is claimed, following the work of philosophers such as Gina Schouten, that political liberalism can (and must) incorporate feminist concerns.

中文翻译：

---

罗尔斯与右翼民粹主义——对前者的有效辩护：对吉拉·斯托勒的回应

这篇对 Gila Stopler 关于政治自由主义和右翼民粹主义可能同谋的挑衅性文章的回复欢迎 Stopler 识别自由主义理论中结构性弱点的策略。但它也提出了三个具体的分歧：首先，有人认为罗尔斯在真正存在的自由民主国家中不像斯托勒所说的那样维护现状；其次，提出了政治自由主义具有对抗右翼民粹主义的重要资源的论点；第三，也是最重要的一点，根据吉娜·舒腾等哲学家的工作，有人声称政治自由主义可以（而且必须）纳入女权主义的关注点。