There are no spaces or spheres of the personal or the private that are not also fraught with political potential and consequence. That insistent lesson from feminist thought is these days instanced, truly writes Gila Stopler, by the bafflements faced by liberal democracies confronting severe threat from illiberal ideas and incitements gathering steam under shelter of liberal basic-liberties guarantees. My questions here are whether the problem’s root in liberalism runs deeper than any ideology of a “private sphere,” and whether it is aggravated by a turn in John Rawls’s defense of liberal principles from a “comprehensive” to a “political” justificatory strategy.

中文翻译：

---

宽容的束缚和对女权主义思想的呼唤：对吉拉·斯托勒的回应

没有任何个人或私人空间或领域不充满政治潜力和后果。从女权主义思想中汲取的持续教训如今得到了例证，吉拉·斯托勒（Gila Stopler）真实写道，自由民主国家面临着来自非自由主义思想的严重威胁的困惑，以及在自由主义基本自由保障的庇护下不断聚集的煽动。我的问题是，自由主义的问题根源是否比任何“私人领域”的意识形态更深，以及约翰·罗尔斯对自由主义原则的辩护是否从“全面”转向“政治”辩护策略而加剧了这一问题。