Indigenous peoples who are taking actions on climate change issues have formed networks that are at the intersect between Indigenous knowledges and various environmental science fields. These climate organizations work across many boundaries in science, politics, and culture. This article asks how large-scale U.S. climate boundary organizations that convene Indigenous and non-Indigenous climate practitioners contend with ongoing colonialism. Analysis indicates that Indigenous-settler networks offer avenues for Indigenous values to be practiced in collaborative climate science. Such organizations also provide limited opportunities to utilize climate science in tribal climate adaptation. While these boundary organizations aim to build meaningful cross-cultural and mentoring relationships, uneven power dynamics and resources also permeate the partnerships. These structural inequalities cause tensions to arise. Tensions further arise from uses of new terminology to navigate longstanding struggles over places, political sovereignties, and human relationships to natural worlds. I argue that a decolonial environmental framework discerns roles for Indigenous governance in attending to anthropogenic climate change. The approach broadens sociological understandings of climate change by examining the attempts of Indigenous and non-Indigenous actors to build climate networks.

在气候变化问题上采取行动的土著人民已经形成了网络，这些网络处于土著知识与各种环境科学领域之间的交汇处。这些气候组织跨越科学，政治和文化的许多领域。本文询问了召集土著和非土著气候从业人员的大规模美国气候边界组织如何应对持续的殖民主义。分析表明，土著定居者网络为在协作气候科学中实践土著价值观提供了途径。这样的组织也提供了有限的机会来利用气候科学来适应部落的气候适应。这些边界组织旨在建立有意义的跨文化和指导关系，伙伴关系还充满着不平衡的动力和资源。这些结构上的不平等导致产生张力。通过使用新术语来解决与地方，政治主权以及与自然世界的人类关系之间的长期斗争，紧张局势进一步加剧。我认为，非殖民化的环境框架可以识别土著治理在应对人为气候变化中的作用。该方法通过研究土著和非土著行为者建立气候网络的尝试，拓宽了对气候变化的社会学理解。我认为，殖民化的环境框架可以识别土著治理在应对人为气候变化中的作用。该方法通过研究土著和非土著行为者建立气候网络的尝试，拓宽了对气候变化的社会学理解。我认为，非殖民化的环境框架可以识别土著治理在应对人为气候变化中的作用。该方法通过研究土著和非土著行为者建立气候网络的尝试，拓宽了对气候变化的社会学理解。