The protection of the ‘European way of life’ has come at the expense of protecting the human rights of migrants. This trade‐off has occurred at border crossings and in host countries, and has left third‐country nationals, including Muslim refugee women, in grey areas of protection. How can we explain these limited protections across the EU? I argue that the limited protections of Muslim refugee women can be explained through a combination of the EU’s fragmented non‐discrimination framework and surging nationalist dynamics. By using Germany as my case study and by drawing on ethnographic research, I propose that Muslim refugee women have been securitized through three distinct but connected ‘threat logics’: refugees as threat, Muslims and Islam as threat, and Muslim women as threat. All three threat logics have been employed by nationalist and right‐wing groups to simultaneously target migration and Islam qua Muslim refugee women.

中文翻译：

---

由谁保护，为谁保护？穆斯林难民妇女面临有争议的欧洲身份

保护“欧洲生活方式”的代价是保护移民的人权。这种折衷发生在边境口岸和东道国，并使包括穆斯林难民妇女在内的第三国国民处于灰色保护区。我们如何解释整个欧盟的这些有限保护措施？我认为，对穆斯林难民妇女的有限保护可以通过欧盟零散的非歧视框架和激增的民族主义动力相结合来解释。通过将德国作为案例研究并利用人种学研究，我建议穆斯林难民妇女通过三种截然不同但相互联系的“威胁逻辑”被证券化：以难民为威胁，以穆斯林和伊斯兰教为威胁，以穆斯林妇女为威胁。所有这三种威胁逻辑已经受雇于民族主义和右翼团体同时目标的迁移和伊斯兰教QUA穆斯林难民妇女。