The concept of ecosystem services (ES) has mainstreamed as an interdisciplinary framework in the urban sustainability and resilience agenda. While the uptake of ES in urban areas is deeply entangled with multiple values, trade-offs, institutions, management and planning approaches, there is still a lack of a comprehensive and systematic framework to address environmental justice (EJ) in urban ES assessments. This article presents a systematic literature review to examine what factors are critical for the effective inclusion of an EJ lens in urban ES appraisals. More specifically, we assessed how distributional, procedural and recognitional EJ dimensions have been addressed, and in relation to which types of urban ES. Our results reveal that EJ considerations are currently focused on the (un)equal distribution of ES and the associated green and blue infrastructure with regard to socioeconomic groups, with special attention to income and race/ethnicity as the main mechanisms of social stratification. There is also a predominant focus on regulating and cultural ES, analyzing their role on resilience and adaptive capacity on one hand, and recreational values, social cohesion and place-making on the other. In this review, we also evaluate the interconnected dimensions of justice and their constraints, and lay out pathways for new research into intersectional and restorative approaches to justice in ES assessments. Finally, we interrogate what the role of urban ES-based planning might be in making more inclusive and just cities and explore its implications for policy and practice.

生态系统服务（ES）的概念已作为跨学科框架纳入了城市可持续性和复原力议程的主流。虽然城市地区对环境的接受与多种价值，权衡，制度，管理和规划方法紧密地纠缠在一起，但仍然缺乏一个全面，系统的框架来应对城市环境评估中的环境正义（EJ）。本文提供了系统的文献综述，以检查哪些因素对于有效地将EJ镜头纳入城市ES评估至关重要。更具体地说，我们评估了如何解决分布，程序和认知的EJ维度，以及与哪种类型的城市ES相关。我们的结果表明，EJ的考虑目前集中在社会经济群体的ES和相关的绿色和蓝色基础设施的（不平等）分配上，并特别关注收入和种族/族裔作为社会分层的主要机制。还主要关注监管和文化ES，一方面分析其在弹性和适应能力上的作用，另一方面分析其娱乐价值，社会凝聚力和场所营造。在这篇综述中，我们还评估了司法的相互关联的维度及其制约因素，并为在ES评估中对司法的交叉和恢复性方法的新研究铺平了道路。最后，