ABSTRACT

Standing electric scooters (e-scooters)’ rapid infiltration as a mobility option has left cities in the limbo of having to deal with regulation and planning for their sudden interruption. As the first city in Australia to allow e-scooter sharing, Brisbane is at the forefront of regulating their use in public space. We reflect on how e-scooter governance can be considered a continually (re)negotiated site of state-market interface, drawing insights from Lindblom’s science of muddling through, Dewey’s socially organised intelligence, and Leitner, Peck, and Sheppard’s discussion on contesting market domination/modes of social regulation.

摘要

站立式电动滑板车（e-scooter）作为一种移动选择的快速渗透使城市陷入了不得不应对突然中断的监管和规划的困境。作为澳大利亚第一个允许共享电动滑板车的城市，布里斯班处于规范电动滑板车在公共空间使用的最前沿。我们反思了如何将电动滑板车治理视为国家-市场接口的持续（重新）谈判站点，从 Lindblom 的混日子科学、杜威的社会组织情报以及 Leitner、Peck 和 Sheppard 关于竞争市场支配地位的讨论中汲取见解/社会监管模式。