Amidst an increasingly complex global environment of trade and travel, with heightened concerns for the unintended or deliberate spread of species and diseases, biosecurity is a key policy goal in many parts of the world. In Australia, there is concern that invasive species (plants, animals, and diseases) enter, spread, and establish, threatening local industries such as agriculture, as well as human health and biodiversity. Shared responsibility for biosecurity is a recent policy direction that has gained great traction but requires improved conceptual and practical clarity in how local citizens are co-opted into or experience biosecurity programs. In this paper, we interrogate the framing and enactment of shared responsibility for biosecurity, propose a repositioning informed by attributes of adaptive governance that involves a clearer structuring of partnerships, and illustrate this through a case example of network-based, passive surveillance. This repositioning is organized around four pillars, where biosecurity is a part of dynamic cosmopolitan territories; enacted through diverse networks; integrating with existing types of knowledge, concerns, and practices; and forming networks of partnership. We consider implications for adaptive governance more generally, centering on structure, power, and decision making.

中文翻译：

---

在生物安全治理中履行分担责任：适应性治理的见解

在日益复杂的全球贸易和旅行环境中，人们日益关注物种和疾病的意外或故意传播，生物安全是世界许多地方的关键政策目标。在澳大利亚，令人关注的是，入侵物种（植物，动物和疾病）进入，传播和建立并威胁着当地产业，例如农业，人类健康和生物多样性。对生物安全负有共同责任，这是最近的政策方向，已受到广泛关注，但需要在概念上和实践上提高地方公民如何参与或体验生物安全计划的清晰度。在本文中，我们询问了生物安全共同责任的框架和制定，提出一种基于适应性治理的属性而进行的重新定位，其中涉及更清晰的伙伴关系结构，并通过基于网络的被动监视的案例来说明这一点。这种重新定位是围绕四个支柱进行的，在这些支柱中，生物安全是充满活力的国际大都市的一部分；通过各种网络制定；与现有类型的知识，关注点和实践相结合；并形成伙伴关系网络。我们以结构，权力和决策为中心，更广泛地考虑对适应性治理的影响。与现有类型的知识，关注点和实践相结合；并形成伙伴关系网络。我们以结构，权力和决策为中心，更广泛地考虑对适应性治理的影响。与现有类型的知识，关注点和实践相结合；并形成伙伴关系网络。我们以结构，权力和决策为中心，更广泛地考虑对适应性治理的影响。