当前位置: X-MOL 学术Human Rights Quarterly › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Scope and Implications of the International Criminal Court's Jurisdictional Decision over the Rohingya Crisis
Human Rights Quarterly ( IF 0.985 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-12
Yuzuki Nagakoshi

In 2018, the International Criminal Court ruled that it has jurisdiction over the Myanmar government's deportation of the Rohingya to Bangladesh. The basis for its jurisdiction was that Bangladesh is an ICC state party, although Myanmar is not. This decision has raised questions on the applicability of the decision to other crimes, including genocide. Moreover, its potential applicability to other situations that have taken place in a non-state party became the subject of much debate. The author concludes that the ICC may exercise its jurisdiction over Myanmar's alleged genocide but not over all international crimes that generate refugees.



中文翻译:

国际刑事法院对罗兴亚危机的管辖权决定的范围和含义

2018年,国际刑事法院裁定它对缅甸政府将罗兴亚人驱逐到孟加拉国具有管辖权。其管辖权的依据是孟加拉国是国际商会缔约国,而缅甸不是。该决定就该决定是否适用于包括种族灭绝在内的其他罪行提出了疑问。此外,其在非缔约国中发生的其他情况的潜在适用性成为许多争论的主题。作者得出的结论是,国际刑事法院可以对缅甸所谓的种族灭绝行径行使管辖权,但不能对产生难民的所有国际罪行行使管辖权。

更新日期:2021-05-12
down
wechat
bug