As postcolonial approaches in the studies of religion have challenged liberal‐secular presuppositions in addressing non‐Western forms of life, there has been a growing concern to examine the normative presuppositions of postcolonial approaches in the field of religious ethics. This paper addresses how Charles Taylor, Talal Asad, and Homi Bhabha show their normative concerns for addressing the interstitial existence of ethnic‐religious minorities, negoriating between their subaltern religions and the inclusive‐but‐exclusive potential of the liberal secular frame of integration. These thinkers raise normative critiques of the spatiotemporal and moral frameworks of liberal, secular integration while suggesting thgeir own normative visions for transforming the existing form of liberal secular democracy. They reveal different models in their normative critiques and visions: Taylor suggests a postsecular and dialogical model, while Asad sets forth an antisecular traditionalist model and Bhabha a pro‐secular and vernacular one.

中文翻译：

---

后殖民方式的规范项目

由于宗教研究中的后殖民主义方法在解决非西方生活形式方面挑战了自由主义-世俗的预设，因此人们越来越关注在宗教伦理学领域中考察后殖民主义的规范性预设。本文探讨了查尔斯·泰勒（Charles Taylor），塔拉·阿萨德（Talal Asad）和霍米·巴巴（Homi Bhabha）如何表达其规范性关注点，以解决族裔宗教少数群体的间质性存在，否定其次要宗教与自由的长期世俗融合框架的包容性但排他性之间的关系。这些思想家对自由的，世俗的融合的时空和道德框架提出了规范的批评，同时提出了大人们自己的规范视野，以改变自由的世俗民主的现有形式。