This commentary begins by outlining current debates on the notion of the Anthropocene from a critical perspective. Subsequently, it will discuss how Pugh and Chandler (2021) directly address such a problematic and how their work contributes to pluralising contemporary academic debates on the Anthropocene. Their previous academic engagements are no stranger to questions of epistemic discrimination in the broad fields of geography, geopolitics, island studies, and social research, and, more concretely, mainstreamed anthropological thinking. This commentary will therefore focus on their call for storiation and its relevance for contemporary debates seeking more ethical, localised, fluid, and coherent approaches to environmental degradation, environmental history, island identity, geopolitics of climate change, and indigeneity. From all the shapes storiation can take, this commentary focuses on indigenous storiation as embodiment.

这篇评论首先从批判性的角度概述了当前关于人类世概念的辩论。随后，它将讨论Pugh和Chandler（2021）如何直接解决这一问题，以及他们的工作如何促进当代人类学研究的多元化。他们先前的学术活动对地理，地理政治，岛屿研究和社会研究等广泛领域的认知歧视问题，尤其是主流的人类学思想并不陌生。因此，本评论将侧重于他们要求存储的呼声及其与当代辩论的相关性，这些辩论旨在寻求更道德，局部，灵活和连贯的方法来应对环境退化，环境历史，岛屿特征，气候变化的地缘政治和土著化问题。