This article articulates and explores a localist conception of citizenship that stands in contrast to more liberal, neoliberal and cosmopolitan conceptions. A localist orientation, and some real sympathy, is evident in specifically ethnographic accounts of voters who supported Trump, Brexit and populism more broadly, including such accounts by Arlie Hochschild, Robert Wuthnow, Kathy Cramer and Justin Gest. This localist orientation echoes the Antifederalist opponents of the American Constitution, Jacksonian Democrats, Tocqueville’s account of American democracy and the American populists. I consider both the virtues and vices of localism. The possible benefits include local practices of nested reciprocity, special obligations, specifically local ‘social bases of selfrespect’ – in the terminology of John Rawls – and feelings of belonging and home (what the Germans call Heimat). However, localism also has its downsides: its resources can empower prejudice and exclusion. I end with a reflection on localism and exclusion in Lorraine Hasberry’s A Raisin in the Sun.

本文阐述并探索了一种地方主义的公民概念，该概念与更为自由，新自由主义和国际大都会的概念形成鲜明对比。在更广泛地支持特朗普，英国退欧和民粹主义的选民的民族志叙述中，特别是在地方志取向和一些真正的同情中，包括阿利·霍奇希尔，罗伯特·伍思诺夫，凯西·克莱默和贾斯汀·盖斯特的叙述，就很明显了。这种地方主义取向与美国宪法的反联邦主义者，杰克逊民主党，托克维尔对美国民主和美国民粹主义者的说法相呼应。我考虑了地方主义的优点和缺点。可能的利益包括嵌套互惠的当地惯例，特殊义务，特别是当地的“自尊的社会基础”（在约翰·罗尔斯（John Rawls）的术语中）以及归属感和住所（德国人称之为Heimat）。但是，地方主义也有其缺点：其资源可以使人们产生偏见和排斥。最后，我对洛林·哈斯伯里（Lorraine Hasberry）阳光下的葡萄干。