When looking through phenomenology articles in human science and philosophy journals, we may be excused to get the impression that they offer an inconsistent array of phenomenology publications. In this article, we describe three simple but helpful distinctions for determining some order: first, the great foundational publications; second, exegetical publications in the wake of the great works; and third, phenomenological studies done directly on phenomena. Our aim in this article is not to lay claim to phenomenology as a label but rather to discuss how “doing phenomenology directly on the phenomena and the things” means taking up a certain attitude and practicing an attentive awareness to the things of the world as we live and experience them. We propose that engaging in philosophical exegesis and argumentation is not very helpful for analyzing and explicating originary meanings of experiential phenomena. And we show how doing phenomenology directly on the things can be facilitated by a phenomenologically inspired interpretive attitude as well as by a sensitive talent for employing phenomenological examples.

浏览人类科学和哲学期刊中的现象学文章时，我们可能会被打扰，以为它们提供的现象学出版物不一致。在本文中，我们描述了用于确定某些顺序的三个简单但有用的区别：第一，伟大的基础出版物；第二，重要的基础著作。第二，伟大作品之后的训ege性出版物；第三，直接对现象进行的现象学研究。我们在本文中的目的不是要以现象学作为标签，而是要讨论“直接对现象和事物进行现象学”意味着采取某种态度并对我们的世界事物进行专心的意识。生活和体验他们。我们认为，进行哲学解释和论证对于分析和解释经验现象的原始含义不是很有帮助。并且，我们展示了如何通过现象学启发的解释态度以及使用现象学实例的敏感人才来促进直接在事物上进行现象学。