当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Counseling Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Are work well-being variables distinct? A bifactor model of fulfilling work.
Journal of Counseling Psychology ( IF 3.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-06 , DOI: 10.1037/cou0000559
Blake A Allan 1 , Taewon Kim 1 , Tracie Y Liu 1 , Rhea L Owens 2
Affiliation  

The strengths-based inclusive theory of work and psychology of working theory propose that fulfilling work is a key outcome of the vocational intervention. Scholars have further argued that fulfilling work is the holistic experience of well-being in the workplace and can be assessed with meaningful work, work engagement, workplace positive emotions, and job satisfaction. This theoretical perspective suggests a bifactor model would best explain the relations among these variables, but this claim remains untested. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether a bifactor model best explained the relations among the four components of fulfilling work, in comparison to other plausible models. We also examined the concurrent and convergent validity of the fulfilling work construct, using other well-being variables, symptoms of distress, and contextual factor variables drawn from vocational theories. Supporting hypotheses, we found that a bifactor model best fit the data. We also found that fulfilling work positively related to eudaimonic work well-being, hedonic work well-being, and life satisfaction and negatively related to symptoms of distress. Finally, fulfilling work positively related to income and subjective social class. These findings offer conceptual and statistical implications of fulfilling work for research, counseling, organizations, and social advocacy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

工作福利变量是否不同?完成工作的双因素模型。

基于优势的包容性工作理论和工作心理学提出,充实的工作是职业干预的一个关键结果。学者们进一步认为,充实的工作是工作场所幸福感的整体体验,可以通过有意义的工作、工作投入、工作场所的积极情绪和工作满意度来评估。这种理论观点表明双因子模型最能解释这些变量之间的关系,但这种说法仍未得到检验。因此,本研究的目的是调查与其他似是而非的模型相比,双因素模型是否能最好地解释完成工作的四个组成部分之间的关​​系。我们还使用其他幸福感变量、痛苦症状、和来自职业理论的背景因素变量。支持假设,我们发现双因子模型最适合数据。我们还发现,有成就感的工作与幸福的工作幸福感、享乐的工作幸福感和生活满意度呈正相关,与痛苦症状呈负相关。最后,充实的工作与收入和主观社会阶层呈正相关。这些发现为研究、咨询、组织和社会倡导工作提供了概念和统计意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。和生活满意度与苦恼症状呈负相关。最后,充实的工作与收入和主观社会阶层呈正相关。这些发现为研究、咨询、组织和社会倡导工作提供了概念和统计意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。和生活满意度与苦恼症状呈负相关。最后,充实的工作与收入和主观社会阶层呈正相关。这些发现为研究、咨询、组织和社会倡导工作提供了概念和统计意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2021-05-06
down
wechat
bug