To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I and Module II, 88 adult psychotherapy participants were administered the Italian translations of the SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II, Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF), Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SF), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) relying on a Williams crossover design. SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II showed excellent inter-rater reliability. In terms of convergent validity, meaningful associations were observed between SCID-5-AMPD Module I scores and self-report measures of Criterion A; similarly, SCID-5-AMPD Module II trait scores were meaningfully related to PID-5 trait scores. As a whole, our preliminary findings supported the clinical utility of DSM-5 AMPD.

中文翻译：

---

DSM-5人格障碍替代模型的结构化临床面试意大利语翻译的信度和效度：模块I和模块II：连续接受心理治疗的门诊患者的初步报告。

为了评估人格障碍DSM-5替代模型（SCID-5-AMPD）模块I和模块II的结构化临床访谈的可靠性和收敛性，对88名成人心理治疗参与者进行了SCID-5-AMPD的意大利语翻译模块I和II，人格功能量表-简表（LPFS-BF），人格功能量表-自我报告（LPFS-SF），DSM-5人格量表（PID-5），人格诊断问卷- 4+（PDQ-4 +）和DSM-5人格障碍的结构化临床访谈（SCID-5-PD）依赖于Williams交叉设计。SCID-5-AMPD模块I和模块II具有出色的内部评估者可靠性。在收敛效度方面，观察到SCID-5-AMPD模块I得分与准则A的自我报告测度之间有意义的关联。同样，SCID-5-AMPD模块II特质评分与PID-5特质评分有意义地相关。总体而言，我们的初步发现支持DSM-5 AMPD的临床实用性。