Despite substantial support for the importance of routine progress monitoring (RPM) as part of evidence-based practice, few providers utilize measurement-based care. This study sought to identify the relative importance of facilitation strategies viewed as most helpful for increasing intention to use RPM among 388 ethnically diverse community therapists serving children and families. Four types of facilitation strategies were examined: language/interpretability, automation, staffing/access, and requirements. Mixed analyses of variance found that therapists' reported intentions to use RPM were more influenced by strategies of automating assessment administration, provision of clerical assistance, and agency requirements than by making linguistically appropriate measures available. However, the importance of strategies differed depending on therapist race/ethnicity and current RPM use. Language/interpretability of RPM assessments was less emphasized for non-Hispanic White therapists and therapists who have not yet or only minimally adopted RPM compared with ethnic minority therapists and therapists who regularly use RPM, respectively. Furthermore, therapists who were not current RPM users emphasized automation more than staffing/access. Results may inform prioritization of implementation facilitation strategies for agencies to encourage RPM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

实施促进策略，以促进社区治疗师的日常进展监测。


尽管大力支持常规进展监测（RPM）作为循证实践的一部分的重要性，但很少有提供者利用基于测量的护理。本研究旨在确定促进策略的相对重要性，这些策略被认为对于提高为儿童和家庭服务的 388 名不同种族的社区治疗师使用 RPM 的意愿最有帮助。研究了四种类型的促进策略：语言/可解释性、自动化、人员配备/访问和要求。混合方差分析发现，治疗师报告的使用 RPM 的意图更多地受到自动化评估管理、提供文书协助和机构要求等策略的影响，而不是受到语言上适当的措施的影响。然而，策略的重要性根据治疗师的种族/民族和当前 RPM 使用情况而有所不同。与少数族裔治疗师和经常使用 RPM 的治疗师相比，非西班牙裔白人治疗师和尚未或仅最低限度采用 RPM 的治疗师分别不太强调 RPM 评估的语言/可解释性。此外，当前不是 RPM 用户的治疗师更强调自动化而不是人员配备/访问。结果可能会为机构实施促进战略的优先顺序提供信息，以鼓励 RPM。 （PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA，保留所有权利）。