Despite substantial support for the importance of routine progress monitoring (RPM) as part of evidence-based practice, few providers utilize measurement-based care. This study sought to identify the relative importance of facilitation strategies viewed as most helpful for increasing intention to use RPM among 388 ethnically diverse community therapists serving children and families. Four types of facilitation strategies were examined: language/interpretability, automation, staffing/access, and requirements. Mixed analyses of variance found that therapists' reported intentions to use RPM were more influenced by strategies of automating assessment administration, provision of clerical assistance, and agency requirements than by making linguistically appropriate measures available. However, the importance of strategies differed depending on therapist race/ethnicity and current RPM use. Language/interpretability of RPM assessments was less emphasized for non-Hispanic White therapists and therapists who have not yet or only minimally adopted RPM compared with ethnic minority therapists and therapists who regularly use RPM, respectively. Furthermore, therapists who were not current RPM users emphasized automation more than staffing/access. Results may inform prioritization of implementation facilitation strategies for agencies to encourage RPM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

实施促进策略，以促进社区治疗师的常规进度监测。

尽管作为基于证据的实践的一部分，人们对例行进度监控（RPM）的重要性给予了大力支持，但很少有提供者采用基于度量的护理。这项研究试图确定便利化策略的相对重要性，该策略被视为对为儿童和家庭服务的388个种族多样化的社区治疗师中增加使用RPM的意图的最大帮助。检查了四类促进策略：语言/可解释性，自动化，人员配备/访问和需求。差异的混合分析发现，与提供语言上适当的措施相比，治疗师报告的使用RPM的意图更受自动化评估管理，文职协助和代理要求的策略的影响。然而，根据治疗师的种族/民族和当前的RPM使用情况，策略的重要性也有所不同。与分别使用RPM的少数族裔治疗师和治疗师相比，非西班牙裔白人治疗师和尚未或仅接受最低限度的RPM的治疗师对RPM评估的语言/可解释性的重视程度较低。此外，当前不是RPM用户的治疗师所强调的是自动化，而不是人员配备/访问。结果可为机构鼓励RPM的实施促进策略提供优先次序。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。与分别使用RPM的少数族裔治疗师和治疗师相比，非西班牙裔白人治疗师和尚未或仅接受最低限度的RPM的治疗师对RPM评估的语言/可解释性的重视程度较低。此外，当前不是RPM用户的治疗师所强调的是自动化，而不是人员配备/访问。结果可为机构鼓励RPM的实施促进策略提供优先次序。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。与分别使用RPM的少数族裔治疗师和治疗师相比，非西班牙裔白人治疗师和尚未或仅接受最低限度的RPM的治疗师对RPM评估的语言/可解释性的重视程度较低。此外，当前不是RPM用户的治疗师所强调的是自动化，而不是人员配备/访问。结果可为机构鼓励RPM的实施促进策略提供优先次序。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。