In Radstaak et al. (2021), the sentence “An active psychoeducational control condition implies a control condition that maintains.” should not appear in the article.

The third paragraph should have read:

In their Commentary, Fava and Guidi (2021) pointed out two concerns about the control condition, the first of which was regarding the operationalization of the control condition. The authors argued that what was called TAU could be better defined as an active, psychoeducational treatment. We agree with Fava and Guidi (2021) that defining our control condition as an active, psychoeducational treatment fits the control condition well. This definition implies a control condition that maintains treatment fidelity by adhering to a clearly defined, manualized therapeutic procedure that is defined by prescriptions rather than proscriptions and allows researchers to control for nonspecific treatment components (Mohr et al., 2009). Nevertheless, we prefer the term TAU because the control condition in our study represented the TAU administered at the institution where the study was conducted.

在 Radstaak 等人。（2021 年），句子“积极的心理教育控制条件意味着维持的控制条件。” 不应出现在文章中。

第三段应该是：

Fava 和 Guidi ( 2021 ) 在他们的评论中指出了对控制条件的两个担忧，第一个是关于控制条件的操作化。作者认为，所谓的 TAU 可以更好地定义为一种积极的心理教育治疗。我们同意 Fava 和 Guidi ( 2021）将我们的控制条件定义为积极的心理教育治疗非常适合控制条件。该定义意味着一种控制条件，通过坚持由处方而非处方定义的明确定义的手动治疗程序来保持治疗保真度，并允许研究人员控制非特异性治疗成分（Mohr 等，2009）。尽管如此，我们更喜欢术语 TAU，因为我们研究中的控制条件代表了在进行研究的机构中管理的 TAU。