In this paper, I examine J. Carroll's “Mirror Argument” against the Humean conception of law and H. Beebee's response to this argument. I will first show that Beebee's criticism is quite plausible if it is refined slightly. Then, I will propose a revised version of the Mirror Argument which is immune to criticisms like that of Beebee's. According to the Humean conception of law, I will argue, we should accept the existence of counterfactual dependence relation where there should not be such relation.

中文翻译：

---

修改卡罗尔的镜面论证

在本文中，我考察了卡罗尔（J. Carroll）的反对“悍马”（Humean）法律观念的“镜面论证”以及H. Beebee对这一论点的回应。我将首先显示，如果对Beebee的批评进行一些细化，这是很合理的。然后，我将提出《镜面论证》的修订版，该修订版不受蜜蜂之类的批评的影响。根据休曼法的概念，我认为，在不存在反事实依存关系的情况下，我们应该接受这种事实。