当前位置: X-MOL 学术Scientometrics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Matthew effect impacts science and academic publishing by preferentially amplifying citations, metrics and status
Scientometrics ( IF 3.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-07 , DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03967-2
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

The fame or status of an academic might not be built exclusively on research merit alone. In a world of competitive publishing, where vanity, metrics and citations play key roles in academics’ survival, for better or for worse, journal or institutional prestige may also serve as catalysts to further promote their status. The Matthew Effect, which breeds success from success, may rely on standing on the shoulders of others, citation bias, or the efforts of a collaborative network. Prestige is driven by resource, which in turn feeds prestige, amplifying advantage and rewards, and ultimately skewing recognition.



中文翻译:

马修效应通过优先放大引文,量度和地位来影响科学和学术出版

学者的名声或地位可能并不仅仅取决于研究的价值。在竞争激烈的出版世界中,虚荣,衡量标准和引文在学者的生存中起着关键作用,无论好坏,期刊或机构的声望也可能成为进一步提升其地位的催化剂。从成功中获取成功的马修效应可能依赖于站在他人的肩膀上,引用偏见或协作网络的努力。信誉是由资源驱动的,而资源又可以馈赠信誉,扩大优势和回报,并最终扭曲识别度。

更新日期:2021-05-07
down
wechat
bug