In 1980, George Mandler published an article in Psychological Review that has become very influential in the study of memory. As evidence, according to Google Scholar (as of August 17, 2020), this article has been cited 3,391 times. Writing about recognition memory, Mandler made a fundamental distinction between recognition involving familiarity and recognition involving recollection. Mandler introduced what has since become the label for his illustration, saying that "Specific identification of an event is not possible on the basis of its familiarity alone. The butcher-in-the-bus is one intuitive demonstration of such an assertion." The purpose of this note is, ironically, to provide context, in this case historical context. Twenty-seven years before Mandler's (1980) article, Charles Osgood (1953) provided a discussion of retention and interference theory in his book, Method and Theory in Experimental Psychology. Is it possible that Mandler inadvertently borrowed Osgood's illustration, a case of cryptomnesia? (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

公共汽车上的屠夫：关于熟识的笔记，不带回忆。

1980年，乔治·曼德勒（George Mandler）在《心理评论》上发表了一篇文章，该文章对记忆的研究非常有影响力。作为证据，根据Google Scholar（截至2020年8月17日），该文章已被引用3,391次。曼德勒（Mandler）在撰写有关识别记忆的文章时，在涉及熟悉的识别与涉及回忆的识别之间做了根本的区分。曼德勒介绍了后来成为他的插图的标签的原因，他说：“仅凭事件的熟悉性就不可能对事件进行具体的识别。屠夫是这种断言的一种直观证明。” 具有讽刺意味的是，此注释的目的是提供上下文，在这种情况下为历史上下文。在Mandler（1980）发表文章之前的27年，查尔斯·奥斯古德（Charles Osgood，1953）在他的《实验心理学的方法和理论》一书中讨论了保留和干扰理论。曼德勒是否可能无意间借用了奥斯古德的插图，这是一例隐秘症？（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。