Reports an error in "I ain't no fortunate one: On the motivated denial of class privilege" by L. Taylor Phillips and Brian S. Lowery (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Jun 18, 2020, np). In the article, in the Independent variables subsection of Experiment 6, the second paragraph is duplicated here in error. The correct location appears as the fourth paragraph of this subsection. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-43040-001.) Invisibility makes privilege powerful. Especially when it remains unexposed, privilege perpetuates inequity by giving unearned advantages to certain groups over others. However, recent social movements (e.g., Occupy) attempt to expose class-based privilege, threatening its invisibility. Across 8 experiments, we show that beneficiaries of class privilege respond to such exposure by increasing their claims of personal hardships and hard work, to cover privilege in a veneer of meritocracy. Experiments 1a-c show that when people are provided evidence of their own class privilege, they claim to have suffered more personal life hardships. Experiment 2 suggests that these claims are driven in part by threats to self-regard. Experiment 3 finds that such self-defense is motivated specifically by a desire to attribute positive outcomes to the self (i.e., sense of personal merit). When given the chance to first bolster their sense of personal merit, those benefitting from privilege no longer claim hardships in response to evidence of privilege. Experiments 4 and 5 further suggest self-concerns are at play: only self-relevant privilege evokes defensive responses, and self-affirmation reduces hardship claims more than does system-affirmation. Finally, Experiment 6 suggests that people claim hardships because they believe these imply personal merit on their part. Preventing the privileged from claiming hardship leads them to claim increased effort in the workplace and to increase effort on a difficult task. Overall, results suggest that even when those benefitting from class privileges are confronted with evidence of their "invisible knapsack," ideologies of personal merit help them cover the privileges of class once again. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

“我不是没有幸运的人：关于有动机地拒绝阶级特权”：对菲利普斯和洛里的更正（2020年）。

在L. Taylor Phillips和Brian S.Lowery的“我不是幸运的人：有动机地拒绝阶级特权”一文中报道了一个错误（人格与社会心理学杂志，高级在线出版物，2020年6月18日，np） 。在本文中，实验6的“独立变量”小节中，错误地重复了第二段。正确的位置出现在本小节的第四段。本文的所有版本都已得到纠正。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2020-43040-001中。）隐身性使特权强大。尤其是当特权仍然处于未公开状态时，特权会通过赋予某些群体相对于其他群体的来之不易的优势来永久保持不平等。但是，最近的社会运动（例如，占领）试图暴露基于阶级的特权，从而威胁到它的隐身性。在8个实验中，我们表明，阶级特权的受益者通过增加对个人艰苦和辛勤工作的主张来应对这种风险，以掩盖精英阶层的特权。实验1a-c显示，当人们获得阶级特权的证据时，他们声称遭受了更多的个人生活困难。实验2表明，这些主张在一定程度上受到自我尊重的威胁的驱使。实验3发现，这种自卫是由将积极成果归因于自身（即个人价值感）的愿望所激发的。如果有机会首先增强他们的个人价值感，那些从特权中受益的人就不会再因特权的证据而遇到困难。实验4和5进一步表明，自我关注正在发挥作用：只有与自我相关的特权才能引起防御性响应，与系统确认相比，自我确认减少了对困难的求偿。最后，实验6建议人们声称自己有困难，因为他们认为这意味着个人的优点。阻止特权者声称困难会使他们要求在工作场所增加努力，并增加在困难任务上的努力。总体而言，研究结果表明，即使那些受益于阶级特权的人面临着“隐形背包”的证据，个人价值观念也可以帮助他们再次享有阶级特权。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。实验6建议人们声称自己有困难，因为他们认为这意味着个人的优点。阻止特权者声称困难会使他们要求在工作场所增加努力，并增加在困难任务上的努力。总体而言，研究结果表明，即使那些受益于阶级特权的人面对着“隐形背包”的证据，个人价值观念也可以帮助他们再次享有阶级特权。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。实验6建议人们声称自己有困难，因为他们认为这意味着个人的优点。阻止特权者声称困难会使他们要求在工作场所增加努力，并增加在困难任务上的努力。总体而言，研究结果表明，即使那些受益于阶级特权的人面对着“隐形背包”的证据，个人价值观念也可以帮助他们再次享有阶级特权。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。结果表明，即使那些受益于阶级特权的人面对着“看不见的背包”的证据，个人价值意识也可以帮助他们再次享有阶级特权。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。结果表明，即使那些受益于阶级特权的人面对着“看不见的背包”的证据，个人价值意识也可以帮助他们再次享有阶级特权。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。