当前位置: X-MOL 学术Clin. Cancer Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Cross-Site Concordance Evaluation of Tumor DNA and RNA Sequencing Platforms for the CIMAC-CIDC Network
Clinical Cancer Research ( IF 10.0 ) Pub Date : 2022-03-23 , DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3251
Zexian Zeng 1, 2 , Jingxin Fu 1, 3 , Carrie Cibulskis 4 , Aashna Jhaveri 1 , Curtis Gumbs 5, 6 , Biswajit Das 7 , Beatriz Sanchez-Espiridion 8, 9 , Sylvie Janssens 10 , Len Taing 11 , Jin Wang 1, 3 , James Lindsay 1 , Tomas Vilimas 7 , Jianhua Zhang 5, 6 , Collin Tokheim 1, 2 , Avinash Sahu 1, 2 , Peng Jiang 12 , Chunhua Yan 13 , Dzifa Yawa Duose 8, 9 , Ethan Cerami 1 , Li Chen 7 , David Cohen 1 , Qingrong Chen 13 , Rebecca Enos 10 , Xin Huang 1 , Jack J Lee 14, 15 , Yang Liu 1, 2 , Donna S Neuberg 1 , Cu Nguyen 13 , Candace Patterson 4 , Sharmistha Sarkar 8, 9 , Sachet Shukla 11, 16 , Ming Tang 1, 2 , Junko Tsuji 4 , Mohamed Uduman 1, 17 , Xiaoman Wang 1 , Jason L Weirather 1, 17 , Jijun Yu 1 , Joyce Yu 1 , Jianjun Zhang 18 , Jiexin Zhang 19 , Daoud Meerzaman 13 , Magdalena Thurin 20 , Andrew Futreal 5, 6 , Chris Karlovich 7 , Stacey B Gabriel 4 , Ignacio Ivan Wistuba 8, 9 , X Shirley Liu 1, 21 , Catherine J Wu 4, 11, 22
Affiliation  

Purpose: Whole-exome (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) are key components of cancer immunogenomic analyses. To evaluate the consistency of tumor WES and RNA-seq profiling platforms across different centers, the Cancer Immune Monitoring and Analysis Centers (CIMAC) and the Cancer Immunologic Data Commons (CIDC) conducted a systematic harmonization study. Experimental Design: DNA and RNA were centrally extracted from fresh frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded non–small cell lung carcinoma tumors and distributed to three centers for WES and RNA-seq profiling. In addition, two 10-plex HapMap cell line pools with known mutations were used to evaluate the accuracy of the WES platforms. Results: The WES platforms achieved high precision (> 0.98) and recall (> 0.87) on the HapMap pools when evaluated on loci using > 50× common coverage. Nonsynonymous mutations clustered by tumor sample, achieving an index of specific agreement above 0.67 among replicates, centers, and sample processing. A DV200 > 24% for RNA, as a putative presequencing RNA quality control (QC) metric, was found to be a reliable threshold for generating consistent expression readouts in RNA-seq and NanoString data. MedTIN > 30 was likewise assessed as a reliable RNA-seq QC metric, above which samples from the same tumor across replicates, centers, and sample processing runs could be robustly clustered and HLA typing, immune infiltration, and immune repertoire inference could be performed. Conclusions: The CIMAC collaborating laboratory platforms effectively generated consistent WES and RNA-seq data and enable robust cross-trial comparisons and meta-analyses of highly complex immuno-oncology biomarker data across the NCI CIMAC-CIDC Network.

中文翻译:


CIMAC-CIDC 网络肿瘤 DNA 和 RNA 测序平台的跨站点一致性评估



目的:全外显子组 (WES) 和 RNA 测序 (RNA-seq) 是癌症免疫基因组分析的关键组成部分。为了评估不同中心之间肿瘤 WES 和 RNA-seq 分析平台的一致性,癌症免疫监测和分析中心 (CIMAC) 和癌症免疫数据共享中心 (CIDC) 进行了系统的协调研究。实验设计:从新鲜冷冻和福尔马林固定石蜡包埋的非小细胞肺癌肿瘤中集中提取 DNA 和 RNA,并分发到三个中心进行 WES 和 RNA-seq 分析。此外,还使用两个具有已知突变的 10 重 HapMap 细胞系库来评估 WES 平台的准确性。结果:当使用 > 50× 共同覆盖度对位点进行评估时,WES 平台在 HapMap 池上实现了高精度 (> 0.98) 和召回率 (> 0.87)。非同义突变按肿瘤样本聚集,在重复、中心和样本处理之间实现了 0.67 以上的特定一致性指数。 RNA 的 DV200 > 24% 作为假定的预测序 RNA 质量控制 (QC) 指标,被发现是在 RNA-seq 和 NanoString 数据中生成一致表达读数的可靠阈值。 MedTIN > 30 同样被评估为可靠的 RNA-seq QC 指标,高于该指标,来自同一肿瘤的重复、中心和样本处理运行的样本可以稳健地聚类,并且可以进行 HLA 分型、免疫浸润和免疫组库推断。结论:CIMAC 合作实验室平台有效地生成了一致的 WES 和 RNA-seq 数据,并能够对整个 NCI CIMAC-CIDC 网络中高度复杂的免疫肿瘤学生物标志物数据进行稳健的交叉试验比较和荟萃分析。
更新日期:2022-03-23
down
wechat
bug