This study aims to investigate how ethical leadership can influence work engagement and workaholism through the potential moderating effect of self-efficacy. There have been debates on the similarities, their negative correlation, and differences between these two work outcomes. To show one new aspect of evidence regarding the debate, we chose ethical leadership as the common antecedent of the outcomes and analyzed the relationships while considering a boundary condition, self-efficacy. For this purpose, using an online questionnaire, we collected primary data from 80 graduate students from a university in Indonesia. An experimental research design was applied, and we used t-test and hierarchical regression analysis to confirm the relationship mentioned above. Results indicate that ethical leadership has a positive effect on work engagement, while it has an insignificant effect on workaholism. Moreover, self-efficacy did not moderate the relationships between ethical leadership and work engagement, or ethical leadership and workaholism. One novelty of the present study is the finding of different consequences of the two “similar” work outcomes from ethical leadership. Implications, limitations, and direction for future research are also discussed.

中文翻译：

---

道德领导力对工作投入和工作狂的影响：检验自我效能作为主持人

这项研究旨在研究道德领导如何通过自我效能的潜在调节作用来影响工作投入和工作狂。关于这两个工作成果之间的相似性，它们之间的负相关以及差异的争论一直存在。为了显示有关辩论的证据的一个新方面，我们选择了道德领导作为结果的共同前提，并在考虑边界条件，自我效能感的同时分析了这种关系。为此，我们使用在线调查表从印度尼西亚一所大学的80名研究生中收集了主要数据。应用了实验研究设计，并且我们使用了t检验和层次回归分析来确认上述关系。结果表明，道德领导对工作投入有积极影响，虽然对工作狂的影响不大。此外，自我效能感并不能缓解道德领导力与工作投入或道德领导力与工作狂之间的关系。本研究的新颖之处在于发现了来自道德领导者的两个“相似”工作成果的不同后果。还讨论了含义，局限性和未来研究的方向。