Contemporary global governance has marked what has been termed as the ‘judicialization of international dispute settlement’.¹ Yet, whereas this has largely meant that international courts are perceived as the main adjudicators of international disputes, the last few years have noted an augmented tendency² both on a global³ as well as regional level,⁴ for international bodies to establish quasi-judicial bodies as accountability mechanisms for violations occurring in the course of either international or non-international armed conflicts.⁵ These bodies come officially under different titles such as fact-finding missions, panels or commissions of inquiry,⁶ yet they share similar features on how they are instituted and on how they view...

中文翻译：

---

准司法机构与评估暴露于敌对行动的平民所遭受的精神伤害的标准和原则的建立

当代全球治理标志着所谓的“国际争端解决的司法化”。¹然而，尽管这在很大程度上意味着将国际法院视为国际争端的主要裁决者，但近几年来，这种趋势呈上升趋势。全球共有²个³以及区域级别，⁴国际机构应建立准司法机构，作为对在国际或非国际武装冲突中发生的侵权行为进行问责的机制。⁵这些机构以不同的头衔正式命名，例如实况调查团，小组或调查委员会，⁶然而，他们在如何建立以及如何看待方面有着相似的特征。